Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
11-7469•John Keith Smith v. V. THOMAS, Captain, Commanding, V.B.C.C.
11-7469Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit24.04.2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-7469
JOHN KEITH SMITH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
V. THOMAS, Captain, Commanding, V.B.C.C.; C. L. HIGHTOWER,
Lieutenant, H.G.C., V.B.C.C.; MIRALES, Deputy, C.G., V.B.C.C.;
R. WHEELER, Deputy, Security, V.B.C.C.; J. KENNEDY, Deputy,
Security, V.B.C.C.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District
Judge. (3:10-cv-00172-HEH)
Submitted: April 19, 2012 Decided: April 24, 2012
Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John Keith Smith, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
John Keith Smith appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Smith v. Thomas, No. 3:10-cv-00172-HEH (E.D. Va. Oct. 12, 2011).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.