Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
11-7445•Ronald Wayne Lewis v. SUHASINI N. SHAH, Medical Doctor, FCI Petersburg
11-7445Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit22.02.2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-7445
RONALD WAYNE LEWIS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SUHASINI N. SHAH, Medical Doctor, FCI Petersburg,
Defendant - Appellee.
No. 11-7450
RONALD WAYNE LEWIS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
HARLEY LAPPIN,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief
District Judge. (3:10-cv-00568-JRS; 3:10-cv-00130-JRS)
Submitted: February 16, 2012 Decided: February 22, 2012
Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
-- 1 of 3 --
2
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ronald Wayne Lewis, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
3
PER CURIAM:
In these consolidated appeals, Ronald Wayne Lewis
appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation
of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his civil rights
actions in which he alleged that he received inadequate medical
care. We have reviewed the records and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Lewis v. Shah, No. 3:10-cv-00568-JRS (E.D. Va.
Oct. 18, 2011); Lewis v. Lappin, No. 3:10-cv-00130-JRS (E.D. Va.
Oct. 18, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.