Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
11-7425•Charles W. Walker, Sr. v. MILDRED RIVERA, Warden FCI Estill
11-7425Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit01.03.2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-7425
CHARLES W. WALKER, SR.,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
MILDRED RIVERA, Warden FCI Estill,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia. Richard M. Gergel, District Judge.
(3:10-cv-02464-RMG)
Submitted: February 22, 2012 Decided: March 1, 2012
Before SHEDD, AGEE, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Charles W. Walker, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Robert Frank Daley,
Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Charles W. Walker, Sr. appeals the district court’s
order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2006 &
Supp. 2011) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. See Walker v. Rivera, No. 3:10-cv-02464-
RMG (D.S.C. filed Sept. 26, 2011; entered Sept. 27, 2011). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.