Earl Thomas v. BENJAMIN ULEP, Medical Doctor; BENJAMIN ULEP, Individual

11-7319Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit27.02.2012

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-7319
EARL THOMAS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
BENJAMIN ULEP, Medical Doctor; BENJAMIN ULEP, Individual,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior
District Judge. (1:10-cv-00245-CMH-JFA)
Submitted: February 23, 2012 Decided: February 27, 2012
Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Earl B. Thomas, III, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Martin
Muldowney, RAWLS & MCNELIS, PC, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Earl Thomas appeals the district court’s orders
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint and
denying Thomas’ motion to amend his complaint to add new
defendants. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. See Thomas v. Ulep, No. 1:10-cv-00245-CMH-JFA
(E.D. Va. filed Mar. 9 & entered Mar. 10, 2011; filed Sept. 13 &
entered Sept. 14, 2011). Further, we deny Thomas’ motion to
compel the production of documents. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.