Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
11-7183•Andrew Burl Wright v. MARY MITCHELL, Warden of FCI
11-7183Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit18.11.2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-7183
ANDREW BURL WRIGHT,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
MARY MITCHELL, Warden of FCI,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Greenville. David C. Norton, Chief District
Judge. (6:10-cv-03147-DCN)
Submitted: November 15, 2011 Decided: November 18, 2011
Before NIEMEYER and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Andrew Burl Wright, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Andrew Burl Wright, a federal prisoner, appeals the
district court’s order denying his motion to reconsider the
court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West
2006 & Supp. 2011) petition. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave
to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Wright v. Mitchell, No. 6:10-cv-03147-
DCN (D.S.C. Aug. 10, 2011). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.