Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
11-6836•Chico Tibbs v. COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA; ARLINGTON SHERIFF; JOHN DOE, Deputy Jailer
11-6836Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit23.11.2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-6836
CHICO TIBBS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA; ARLINGTON SHERIFF; JOHN DOE,
Deputy Jailer,
Defendants - Appellees.
and
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA; STEPHEN M. HERRICK; PAMLA
SARGENT,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema,
District Judge. (1:10-cv-00782-LMB-TRJ)
Submitted: November 17, 2011 Decided: November 23, 2011
Before KING, DAVIS, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Chico Tibbs, Appellant Pro Se. Jack L. Gould, Fairfax,
Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Chico Tibbs appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) action alleging that the
conditions of his temporary confinement at the Arlington County
Jail violated his constitutional rights. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the
district court’s order. See Tibbs v. Commonwealth of Virginia,
No. 1:10-cv-00782-LMB-TRJ (E.D. Va. filed June 16, 2011; entered
June 17, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.