Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
11-6772•Clavon D. Jones v. Captain Thomas
11-6772Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit19.10.2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-6772
CLAVON D. JONES,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
CAPTAIN THOMAS; LIEUTENANT BRADLEY; WARDEN A. PADULA;
ROBERT WARDS; JON OZMINT; ASSOCIATE WARDEN BROOKS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Greenville. Richard M. Gergel, District
Judge. (6:10-cv-02486-RMG)
Submitted: October 17, 2011 Decided: October 19, 2011
Before DUNCAN, DAVIS, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Clavon D. Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Samuel F. Arthur, III, James
Rufus Bratton, III, AIKEN, BRIDGES, NUNN, ELLIOTT & TYLER, PA,
Florence, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Clavon D. Jones appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Jones v. Thomas, No. 6:10-cv-02486-RMG (D.S.C. May 23, 2011).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.