Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
11-6710•Robert Lee Hood v. Buncombe County Jail
11-6710Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit17.10.2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-6710
ROBERT LEE HOOD,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
BUNCOMBE COUNTY JAIL; VAN SMITH, Detective; MIKE DOWNING,
Detective; STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA; ROBERT W. FISHER, Twenty-
eighth Solicitorial District of North Carolina, Asheville, NC,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Robert J. Conrad,
Jr., Chief District Judge. (1:91-cv-00078-RJC)
Submitted: October 13, 2011 Decided: October 17, 2011
Before SHEDD, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert Lee Hood, Appellant Pro Se. Curtis William Euler,
BUNCOMBE COUNTY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Asheville, North Carolina,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Robert Lee Hood appeals the district court’s order
dismissing Hood’s motion to reconsider the denial of relief on
his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. Hood v. Buncombe
County Jail, No. 1:91-cv-00078-RJC (W.D.N.C. May 17, 2011).
Hood’s motion for appointment of appellate counsel is denied.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.