Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
11-6402•Robert Pharoah Howard v. Officer T. Large; Officer J. Gibson
11-6402Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit02.08.2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-6402
ROBERT PHAROAH HOWARD,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
OFFICER T. LARGE; OFFICER J. GIBSON,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
TRACY S. RAY, Chief Warden; GENE M. JOHNSON,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, Chief
District Judge. (7:10-cv-00052-GEC-MFU)
Submitted: July 18, 2011 Decided: August 2, 2011
Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert Pharoah Howard, Appellant Pro Se. Mark R. Davis,
Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Robert Pharoah Howard appeals the district court’s
judgment entered after a jury found in favor of Appellees and
denied relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have
reviewed the record, conclude that the issues Howard raises do
not present substantial questions, and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we deny Howard’s motion for preparation of the
trial transcript at government expense and affirm the judgment
of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.