Roger Hargrave v. P. G. County Circuit Court; States Attorney’s Office; County Attorney’s Office

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-6401
ROGER HARGRAVE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
P. G. COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT; STATES ATTORNEY’S OFFICE; COUNTY
ATTORNEY’S OFFICE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson Everett Legg, District Judge.
(1:11-cv-00223-BEL)
Submitted: July 28, 2011 Decided: August 2, 2011
Before SHEDD, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Roger Hargrave, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Roger Hargrave appeals the district court’s order
construing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) action as a mandamus
petition and denying relief and the court’s order denying his
subsequent motion to reconsider. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. See Hargrave v. Prince
George’s Cnty. Circuit Court, No. 1:11-cv-00223-BEL (D. Md. Feb.
7, 2011 & Feb. 24, 2011). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --