Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
11-6284•United States of America v. Darryl Eugene Williamson
11-6284Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit20.06.2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-6284
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
DARRYL EUGENE WILLIAMSON,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Durham. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr.,
Senior District Judge. (1:97-cr-00181-NCT-1)
Submitted: June 16, 2011 Decided: June 20, 2011
Before NIEMEYER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON,
Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Darryl Eugene Williamson, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Michael
Hamilton, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North
Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Darryl Eugene Williamson appeals the district court’s
judgment denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006) motion for a
reduction in sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Williamson’s motion for
appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. United States v. Williamson, No. 1:97-cr-00181-
NCT-1 (M.D.N.C. Feb. 7, 2011). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.