Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
11-6043•United States of America v. Charles Junior Locklear, a/k/a Ron
11-6043Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit21.07.2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-6043
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
CHARLES JUNIOR LOCKLEAR, a/k/a Ron,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle,
District Judge. (7:09-cr-00101-BO-1)
Submitted: June 16, 2011 Decided: July 21, 2011
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Charles Junior Locklear, Appellant Pro Se. J. Frank Bradsher,
Seth Morgan Wood, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh,
North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Charles Junior Locklear appeals the district court’s
order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm substantially on the reasoning of the district court.
Locklear v. United States, No. 7:09-cr-00101-BO-1 (E.D.N.C.
Nov. 9, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.