Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
11-2375•Xuli Zhang v. Police S. Regan; Police Pec. M. Green
11-2375Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit30.04.2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-2375
XULI ZHANG,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
POLICE S. REGAN; POLICE PEC. M. GREEN,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Theresa C. Buchanan,
Magistrate Judge. (1:10-cv-01329-TCB)
Submitted: April 26, 2012 Decided: April 30, 2012
Before GREGORY, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Xuli Zhang, Appellant Pro Se. Karen L. Gibbons, COUNTY
ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Xuli Zhang appeals the magistrate judge’s order
denying her post-judgment motion to correct the clerk’s mistake.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate
judge. Zhang v. Regan, No. 1:10-cv-01329-TCB (E.D. Va. filed
Dec. 7, 2011 & entered Dec. 8, 2011). We deny Zhang’s motions
for sanctions and for relief from the judgment. We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.