Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
11-2216•Gayle Gene S. Navey v. Virginia Beach City Public Schools
11-2216Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit27.04.2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-2216
GAYLE GENE S. NAVEY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
VIRGINIA BEACH CITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District
Judge. (2:11-cv-00142-RAJ-TEM)
Submitted: April 24, 2012 Decided: April 27, 2012
Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Gayle Gene S. Navey, Appellant Pro Se. Elaine Inman Hogan,
CRENSHAW WARE & MARTIN, PLC, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Gayle Gene S. Navey appeals the district court’s order
dismissing her employment discrimination suit for failure to
state a claim. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the
district court. Navey v. Va. Beach City Pub. Schs., No. 2:11-
cv-00142-RAJ-TEM (E.D. Va. Sept. 28, 2011). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.