Michael A. Scott v. City of Norfolk; Regina V.k. Williams; Bernard A. Pishko; K. Hannan; S. Michael; E. Zysk

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-2203
MICHAEL A. SCOTT,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CITY OF NORFOLK; REGINA V.K. WILLIAMS; BERNARD A. PISHKO; K.
HANNAN; S. MICHAEL; E. ZYSK,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District
Judge. (2:10-cv-00611-RAJ-DEM)
Submitted: February 14, 2012 Decided: February 23, 2012
Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael A. Scott, Appellant Pro Se. Melvin Wayne Ringer, CITY
ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Michael A. Scott appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Scott v. City of Norfolk, No. 2:10-cv-00611-RAJ-DEM
(E.D. Va. Sept. 30, 2011). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --