Gesamter Gesetzestext
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-2122
CHARLES E. SIMMS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
THOMAS DAME,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District
Judge. (8:11-cv-02420-AW)
Submitted: February 16, 2012 Decided: February 21, 2012
Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Charles Simms, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Charles Simms appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint and
denying his motion for appointment of counsel. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. Simms v. Dame,
No. 8:11-cv-02420-AW (D. Md. Sept. 16, 2011). We deny Simms’
motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
