Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
11-2112•Todd V. Campbell v. Verizon Virginia, Incorporated
11-2112Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit18.06.2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-2112
TODD V. CAMPBELL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
VERIZON VIRGINIA, INCORPORATED,
Defendant – Appellee,
and
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INCORPORATED,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Dennis W. Dohnal, Magistrate
Judge. (3:11-cv-00002-DWD)
Submitted: June 11, 2012 Decided: June 18, 2012
Before NIEMEYER, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
W. Barry Montgomery, KALBAUGH, PFUND & MESSERSMITH, PC,
Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant. Stephanie Ploszay Karn,
Briton K. Nelson, MCGUIREWOODS LLP, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellee.
-- 1 of 3 --
2
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
3
PER CURIAM:
Todd V. Campbell appeals the magistrate judge’s order*
granting summary judgment on his interference and retaliation
claims. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
magistrate judge. Campbell v. Verizon Va., Inc., No. 3:11-cv-
00002-DWD (E.D. Va. Sept. 13, 2011) We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
* With the consent of the parties, the magistrate judge
exercised jurisdiction over this litigation, as authorized by 28
U.S.C. § 636(c)(1) (2006).
-- 3 of 3 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.