Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
11-2111•DOUGLAS KERR, M.D., PhD v. the Johns Hopkins University
11-2111Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit14.05.2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-2111
DOUGLAS KERR, M.D., PhD,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
THE JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson Everett Legg, District Judge.
(1:10-cv-03294-BEL)
Submitted: May 1, 2012 Decided: May 14, 2012
Before NIEMEYER, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Donald C. Holmes, DONALD C. HOLMES & ASSOCIATES, P.A.,
Greensboro, Maryland, for Appellant. James L. Shea, Dino S.
Sangiamo, Viktoriya M. Shpigelman, VENABLE LLP, Baltimore,
Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Douglas Kerr, M.D., Ph.D., appeals the district
court’s order dismissing his complaint for failure to state a
claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district
court. Kerr v. Johns Hopkins Univ., No. 1:10-cv-03294-BEL (D.
Md. Sept. 12, 2011) We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the Court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.