Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
11-1989•Fariba Waldrop v. Science Applications International Corporation
11-1989Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit08.05.2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-1989
FARIBA WALDROP,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District
Judge. (8:10-cv-00328-AW)
Submitted: April 30, 2012 Decided: May 8, 2012
Before MOTZ, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Joyce E. Smithey, RIFKIN, LIVINGSTON, LEVITAN & SILVER, LLC,
Annapolis, Maryland, for Appellant. Linda Hitt Thatcher,
Robert J. Baror, THATCHER LAW FIRM, LLC, Greenbelt, Maryland,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Fariba Waldrop appeals the district court’s order
granting summary judgment to Defendant in this action alleging
national origin discrimination and retaliation, in violation of
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Waldrop
v. Science Applications Int’l Corp., No. 8:10-cv-00328-AW (D.
Md. Sept. 9, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.