Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
11-1946•Donna Young v. Hp Enterprise Services, a/k/a Electronic Data Systems
11-1946Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit12.04.2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-1946
DONNA YOUNG,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
HP ENTERPRISE SERVICES, a/k/a Electronic Data Systems,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior
District Judge. (1:10-cv-01096-CMH-JFA)
Submitted: April 3, 2012 Decided: April 12, 2012
Before MOTZ, SHEDD, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Donna Young, Appellant Pro Se. John Daniel Victor Ferman,
Gregory Willis Homer, DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH, LLP, Washington,
D.C., for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Donna Young appeals the district court’s order
granting summary judgment for Defendant in Young’s employment
discrimination suit. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Young v. HP Enter. Servs., No. 1:10-cv-
01096-CMH-JFA (E.D. Va. Aug. 8, 2011; Sept. 6, 2011). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.