Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
11-1928•William Thomas Davis v. John Richard Yeager, Jr.
11-1928Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit30.12.2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-1928
WILLIAM THOMAS DAVIS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JOHN RICHARD YEAGER, JR.,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp,
Jr., Senior District Judge. (5:11-cv-00061-FPS-JES)
Submitted: December 12, 2011 Decided: December 30, 2011
Before AGEE, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William Thomas Davis, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
William Thomas Davis appeals the district court’s
order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
dismissing his complaint. We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. See Davis v. Yeager, No. 5:11-cv-
00061-FPS-JES (N.D. W. Va. Aug. 10, 2011). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.