Warren K. Gladden v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE; GARY LOCKE, Secretary

11-1919Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit09.04.2012

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-1919
WARREN K. GLADDEN,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE; GARY LOCKE,
Secretary,
Defendants – Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, Senior District
Judge. (8:10-cv-01756-PJM)
Submitted: March 16, 2012 Decided: April 9, 2012
Before DIAZ and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Warren K. Gladden, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph Ronald Baldwin,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Warren K. Gladden appeals the district court’s order
granting summary judgment to Defendants on Gladden’s claims of
employment discrimination and retaliation in violation of Title
VII of the Civil Rights Act and the Age Discrimination in
Employment Act. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Gladden v. U.S. Dep’t of Commerce, No.
8:10-cv-01756-PJM (D. Md. June 30, 2011). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.