Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
11-1894•Macarthur Day v. Frank Morgan
11-1894Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit09.02.2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-1894
MACARTHUR DAY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
FRANK MORGAN; CONNIE LONG; ED ESTRIDGE; LEE WALKER; RONALD
CHESTNUT; LINDA HORTON; KCSD, Kershaw County School
District,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District
Judge. (3:10-cv-00454-JFA)
Submitted: January 30, 2012 Decided: February 9, 2012
Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
MacArthur Day, Appellant Pro Se. Kenneth Lendren Childs,
Jasmine Rogers Drain, Allen Dean Smith, CHILDS & HALLIGAN,
Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
MacArthur Day appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
dismissing his complaint. We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. Day v. Morgan, No. 3:10-cv-00454-
JFA (D.S.C. Aug. 3, 2011). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.