Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
11-1829•Warren K. Gladden v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE; GARY LOCKE, Secretary
11-1829Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit17.02.2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-1829
WARREN K. GLADDEN,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE; GARY LOCKE,
Secretary,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, Senior District
Judge. (8:10-cv-01665-PJM)
Submitted: February 9, 2012 Decided: February 17, 2012
Before DIAZ and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Warren K. Gladden, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph Ronald Baldwin,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Warren K. Gladden appeals the district court’s order
granting Defendants’ motion for summary judgment in his action
filed pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act and the Age
Discrimination in Employment Act. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Gladden v. United States
Dep’t of Commerce, No. 8:10-cv-01665-PJM (D. Md. May 31, 2011).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.