Tangela Anita Harris, a/k/a Tanger Anita Harris v. Progressive Casualty Insurance Company

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-1808
TANGELA ANITA HARRIS, a/k/a Tanger Anita Harris,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
PROGRESSIVE CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Anderson. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (8:11-cv-01303-HMH)
Submitted: October 13, 2011 Decided: October 17, 2011
Before SHEDD, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Tangela Anita Harris, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Tangela Anita Harris appeals the district court’s
order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
summarily dismissing her civil action as barred by the statute
of limitations. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court in its
order dismissing Harris’ action without prejudice. Harris v.
Progressive Cas. Ins. Co., No. 8:11-cv-01303-HMH (D.S.C. June
27, 2011).* We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
* Although a dismissal without prejudice is ordinarily not a
final, appealable order, Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers
Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993), the
applicable three-year statute of limitations period has passed.
S.C. Code Ann. § 15-3-530(5), (8) (2005). Thus, the district
court’s order is effectively a final order.

-- 2 of 2 --