Millard Burton Harman v. David A. Bunch; Kenneth Droddy

11-1748Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit24.01.2012

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-1748
MILLARD BURTON HARMAN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DAVID A. BUNCH; KENNETH DRODDY,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief
District Judge. (3:10-cv-00759-JRS-DWD)
Submitted: January 9, 2012 Decided: January 24, 2012
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Scott Gregory Crowley, Sr., CROWLEY & CROWLEY, Richmond,
Virginia, for Appellant. William F. Etherington, Leslie A.
Winneberger, BEALE, DAVIDSON, ETHERINGTON & MORRIS, P.C.,
Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Millard Burton Harman appeals the district court’s
order granting summary judgment to Appellees. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. Harman v. Bunch,
No. 3:10-cv-00759-JRS-DWD (E.D. Va. June 16, 2011). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.