John G. Singletary, Jr. v. Wells Fargo Wachovia Mortgage Corporation, its employees to include agents individually

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-1630
JOHN G. SINGLETARY, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
and
CARLA C. SINGLETARY,
Appellant,
v.
WELLS FARGO WACHOVIA MORTGAGE CORPORATION, its employees to
include agents individually and collectively to include
David Bates,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston. Bristow Marchant, Magistrate
Judge. (2:11-cv-00484-MBS-BM)
Submitted: August 22, 2011 Decided: September 9, 2011
Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John G. Singletary, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Hamlet Sam Mabry,
III, HAYNSWORTH, SINKLER & BOYD, PA, Greenville, South Carolina;

-- 1 of 3 --

2
Stafford J. McQuillin, III, HAYNSWORTH, SINKLER & BOYD, PA,
Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
John G. Singletary, Jr., seeks to appeal the district
court’s entry of a scheduling order in his civil suit against
Wells Fargo Wachovia Mortgage Corporation. This court may
exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291
(2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28
U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial
Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order
Singletary seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an
appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, as
no judge has requested a poll on Singletary’s motion for en banc
reconsideration of the denial of his motion for stay, we deny
that motion and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED

-- 3 of 3 --