Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
11-1604•Freddy S. Campbell v. United States of America
11-1604Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit17.10.2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-1604
FREDDY S. CAMPBELL,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; CARTER COUNTY DETENTION CENTER;
RANDY BINION, Chief Jailer - Carter County Detention
Center; JOHN PERRINE, Supervising Marshall - United States
Marshals Service; BRENDA WILBURN, R.N. - Carter County
Detention Center,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Charleston. John T. Copenhaver,
Jr., District Judge. (2:09-cv-00503)
Submitted: October 13, 2011 Decided: October 17, 2011
Before SHEDD, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Freddy S. Campbell, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Michael Horn,
Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia; R.
Stephen McGinnis, MCBRAYER, MCGINNIS, LESLIE & KIRKLAND, PLLC,
Greenup, Kentucky, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Freddy S. Campbell appeals the district court’s order
denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. Campbell v. United
States, No. 2:09-cv-00503 (S.D.W. Va. May 27, 2011). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.