Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
11-1481•Christopher Jay Dudley v. 4-McCar-T, Incorporated; McDonald’s
11-1481Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit15.12.2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-1481
CHRISTOPHER JAY DUDLEY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
4-MCCAR-T, INCORPORATED; MCDONALD’S,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District
Judge. (7:09-cv-00520-sgw-mfu)
Submitted: November 30, 2011 Decided: December 15, 2011
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Christopher Jay Dudley, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Robert Becker,
VORYS, SATER, SEYMOUR & PEASE, Washington, D.C.; Steven R.
Miller, VORYS, SATER, SEYMOUR & PEASE, Cincinnati, Ohio; Adam J.
Rocco, VORYS, SATER, SEYMOUR & PEASE, Columbus, Ohio; Gregory
Branch Robertson, HUNTON & WILLIAMS, LLP, Richmond, Virginia,
for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Christopher Jay Dudley appeals the district court’s
order denying relief on his employment discrimination claims.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Dudley v. 4-McCar-T, Inc., No. 7:09-cv-00520-sgw-mfu
(W.D. Va. May 4, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.