Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
11-1285•Emma Victoria Howard v. Unc Healthcare System
11-1285Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit29.08.2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-1285
EMMA VICTORIA HOWARD,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
UNC HEALTHCARE SYSTEM; NORMAN KLASE, Human Resource Manager
In His Official Capacity; SUSAN PHILLIPS, Vice President For
Surgical Services, Individually and In Her Official
Capacity; PATT STURDIVANT, Chief Anesthesia Technician,
Individually and In Her Official Capacity; GAIL WALKER,
Team-Leader For Anesthesia Technicians & Central Supply
Technicians, Individually and In Her Official Capacity;
BONNIE OVERMAN, American Disability Agent & Equal Employment
Opportunity Agent, Individually and In Her Official
Capacity,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. William L. Osteen,
Jr., District Judge. (1:10-cv-00047-WO-PTS)
Submitted: August 25, 2011 Decided: August 29, 2011
Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Emma Victoria Howard, Appellant Pro Se. Celia Grasty Lata, UNC
HOSPITALS/UNC HEALTH CARE, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, for
-- 1 of 3 --
2
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
3
PER CURIAM:
Emma Victoria Howard appeals the district court’s
order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
dismissing her employment discrimination action. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Howard
v. UNC Healthcare Sys., No. 1:10-cv-00047-WO-PTS (M.D.N.C. Mar.
7, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.