Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
11-1230•Michael E. Kennedy v. Chesapeake Utilities Corporation
11-1230Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit21.07.2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-1230
MICHAEL E. KENNEDY,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
CHESAPEAKE UTILITIES CORPORATION,
Defendant – Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson Everett Legg, District Judge.
(1:10-cv-02256-BEL)
Submitted: June 3, 2011 Decided: July 21, 2011
Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael E. Kennedy, Appellant Pro Se. Brian M. Quinn, DLA PIPER
US LLP, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Michael E. Kennedy appeals the district court’s order
granting Chesapeake Utilities Corporation’s motion to dismiss
Kennedy’s action alleging violations of the federal Fair Debt
Collections Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1692-1692p (2006), the
Maryland Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, Md. Code Ann., Bus.
Reg. § § 7-101 et seq.; Md. Code Ann., Com. Law §§ 14-201 et
seq. (LexisNexis 2005 & Supp. 2010), and Maryland common law.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Kennedy v. Chesapeake Utilities Corp. No. 1:10-cv-02256-
BEL (D. Md. Mar. 8, 2011). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.