Teresa A. Ratledge v. Science Applications International Corporation

11-1207Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit24.10.2011

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-1207
TERESA A. RATLEDGE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION,
Defendant – Appellee,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Party-in-Interest.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior
District Judge. (1:10-cv-00239-CMH-TCB)
Submitted: October 20, 2011 Decided: October 24, 2011
Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jay Ian Igiel, NEALON & ASSOCIATES, P.C., Alexandria, Virginia;
Howard N. Berliner, BERLINER LAW FIRM, PLLC, Washington, D.C.,
for Appellant. Brian Z. Liss, SAIC, McLean, Virginia; Robert R.
Sparks, Jr., SPARKS & CRAIG, LLP, McLean, Virginia, for
Appellee.

-- 1 of 3 --

2
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Teresa A. Ratledge appeals the district court’s order
granting Defendant’s motion for summary judgment. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Ratledge v. Science Applications Int’l Corp., No. 1:10-cv-00239-
CMH-TCB (E.D. Va. filed Feb. 10, 2011; entered Feb. 11, 2011).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.