Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
11-1189•Dwight W. Thorn v. KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, Secretary, Department of Health & Human Services
11-1189Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit14.02.2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-1189
DWIGHT W. THORN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, Secretary, Department of Health & Human
Services,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, Chief District
Judge. (8:10-cv-00299-DKC)
Submitted: February 7, 2012 Decided: February 14, 2012
Before KING, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Donna Beasley, Washington, D.C., for Appellant. Rod J.
Rosenstein, United States Attorney, Neil R. White, Assistant
United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Dwight W. Thorn appeals the district court’s order
granting summary judgment in favor of the Appellee on each of
his employment discrimination claims. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the
judgment of the district court. Thorn v. Sebelius, No. 8:10-cv-
00299-DKC (D. Md. Feb. 1, 2011). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.