Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
10-7520•Ricky Glendall Davis v. TIMOTHY A. SMITH, Patrol Officer, Suffolk Police Department
10-7520Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit09.03.2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-7520
RICKY GLENDALL DAVIS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
TIMOTHY A. SMITH, Patrol Officer, Suffolk Police Department;
J.R. RIVERA, Patrol Officer, Suffolk Police Department,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District
Judge. (3:09-cv-00274-HEH)
Submitted: February 28, 2011 Decided: March 9, 2011
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and KING and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ricky Glendall Davis, Appellant Pro Se. D. Rossen S. Greene,
PENDER & COWARD, Suffolk, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Ricky Glendall Davis, a state prisoner, appeals the
district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Davis v. Smith, No. 3:09-cv-00274-HEH
(E.D. Va. Sept. 28, 2010). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.