Rohaji D. Dale v. LANCE P. FORSYTHE, Superintendant

10-7294Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit02.12.2010

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-7294
ROHAJI D. DALE,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
LANCE P. FORSYTHE, Superintendant; DOCTOR OFOGH, Doctor;
GENE JOHNSON, Director of Prisons; CHRISTY GRAY, LPN Nurse;
ERICA POWELL, EMT Worker; C. E. DAVIS, Warden; DR. M.
MILITANA, Doctor; DOCTOR HERCULES, Doctor,
Defendants – Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Mark S. Davis, District
Judge. (2:09-cv-00624-MSD-DEM)
Submitted: November 18, 2010 Decided: December 2, 2010
Before SHEDD and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Rohaji D. Dale, Appellant Pro Se. Lisa H. Leiner, HARMAN,
CLAYTOR, CORRIGAN & WELLMAN, Richmond, Virginia; Richard Carson
Vorhis, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia;
Jeff W. Rosen, PENDER & COWARD, PC, Virginia Beach, Virginia;
Lloyd Lee Byrd, Ruth Griggs, SANDS ANDERSON, PC, Richmond,
Virginia, for Appellees.

-- 1 of 3 --

2
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Rohaji Dale appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Dale v.
Forsythe, No. 2:09-cv-00624-MSD-DEM (E.D. Va. Aug. 17, 2010).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.