United States of America v. Monstsho Eugene Vernon

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-7136
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
MONSTSHO EUGENE VERNON,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (6:01-cr-00239-HMH-3)
Submitted: September 28, 2010 Decided: October 6, 2010
Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Monstsho Eugene Vernon, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Jean
Howard, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South
Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Monstsho Eugene Vernon appeals the district court’s
order denying his motion filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
3582(c)(2) (2006), which sought a reduction in his sentence
based upon Amendment 599 to the Sentencing Guidelines. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United
States v. Vernon, No. 6:01-cr-00239-HMH-3 (D.S.C. Aug. 4, 2010).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --