Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
10-7061•United States of America v. Steven Dixon Prentice
10-7061Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit02.03.2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-7061
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
STEVEN DIXON PRENTICE,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Durham. James A. Beaty, Jr.,
Chief District Judge. (1:01-cr-00031-JAB-1)
Submitted: January 28, 2011 Decided: March 2, 2011
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Steven Dixon Prentice, Appellant Pro Se. Joan Brodish Binkley,
Assistant Attorney General, Greensboro, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Steven Dixon Prentice appeals the district court’s
order substituting the North Carolina Fund for Medical
Assistance (Medicaid) for the Orange County Department of Social
Services as the payee of restitution ordered in this case. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. United States v. Prentice, No. 1:01-cr-00031-JAB-1
(M.D.N.C. Oct. 22, 2009). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.