James Arthur Biggins v. LEAH T. SEATON, Deputy Public Defender; JOHN P. RUE, District Public Defender

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-7040
JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
LEAH T. SEATON, Deputy Public Defender; JOHN P. RUE,
District Public Defender,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, Senior District
Judge. (8:10-cv-01488-PJM)
Submitted: September 28, 2010 Decided: October 6, 2010
Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James Arthur Biggins, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
James Arthur Biggins appeals the district court’s
orders dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28
U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2006) and denying reconsideration. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Biggins
v. Seaton, No. 8:10-cv-01488-PJM (D. Md. June 11 & July 9,
2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --