Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
10-6787•United States of America v. Robert Henry Davis, a/k/a Pops
10-6787Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit08.12.2010
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-6787
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
ROBERT HENRY DAVIS, a/k/a Pops,
Defendant – Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, Senior District
Judge. (8:00-cr-00424-PJM-2)
Submitted: November 19, 2010 Decided: December 8, 2010
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert Henry Davis, Appellant Pro Se. John Walter Sippel, Jr.,
Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Robert Henry Davis appeals the district court’s orders
denying his self-styled Fed. R. Crim. P. 36 motion to correct a
clerical error in his criminal judgment, as well as its order
denying his amended Rule 36 motion to correct a clerical error
in his presentence investigation report. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the
district court’s orders. See United States v. Davis, No. 8:00-
cr-00424-PJM-2 (D. Md. May 11, 2010). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.