Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
10-6435•Bobby D. Seay v. TERRY O’BRIEN, Warden, USP Lee County
10-6435Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit09.02.2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-6435
BOBBY D. SEAY,
Petitioner – Appellant,
v.
TERRY O’BRIEN, Warden, USP Lee County,
Respondent – Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior
District Judge. (7:09-cv-00361-jct-mfu)
Submitted: January 28, 2011 Decided: February 9, 2011
Before AGEE, DAVIS, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Bobby D. Seay, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Linn Eckert, Assistant
United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Bobby D. Seay, a federal prisoner, appeals the
district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241
(2006) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Seay v. O’Brien, No. 7:09-cv-00361-jct-
mfu (W.D. Va. Mar. 9, 2010). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.