Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
10-6402•United States of America v. Troy Pelts, a/k/a James Lee Start
10-6402Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit03.08.2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-6402
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
TROY PELTS, a/k/a James Lee Start,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Winston-Salem. James A. Beaty,
Jr., Chief District Judge. (6:92-cr-00305-JAB-1)
Submitted: July 21, 2011 Decided: August 3, 2011
Before MOTZ and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Troy Pelts, Appellant Pro Se. L. Patrick Auld, Assistant United
States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Troy Pelts appeals the district court’s orders denying
his motion filed under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) for
reduction of sentence and denying his motion for an extension of
time to file an appeal. We have reviewed the record and Pelts’s
contentions regarding his § 3582(c)(2) motion and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. United States v. Pelts, No.
6:92-cr-00305-JAB-1 (M.D.N.C. July 13, 2009). Because we have
reviewed Pelts’s challenge to the denial of a sentence reduction
on the merits, we find his appeal of the denial of the motion
for an extension to be moot. United States v. Pelts, No.
6:92-cr-00305-JAB-1 (M.D.N.C. Jan. 8, 2010). Finally, we
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.