Joe Rangel v. Patricia Stansberry

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-6387
JOE RANGEL,
Petitioner – Appellant,
v.
PATRICIA STANSBERRY,
Respondent – Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. M. Hannah Lauck, Magistrate
Judge. (3:08-cv-00782-MHL)
Submitted: June 24, 2010 Decided: July 1, 2010
Before DUNCAN, AGEE, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Joe Rangel, Appellant Pro Se. Jonathan Holland Hambrick,
Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Joe Rangel, a federal prisoner, appeals the magistrate
judge’s order*
AFFIRMED
denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West
2006 & Supp. 2010) petition. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the magistrate judge. Rangel v. Stansberry,
No. 3:08-cv-00782-MHL (E.D. Va., Jan. 12, 2010). We deny
Rangel’s motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
* The parties consented to the exercise of jurisdiction by
the magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2006).

-- 2 of 2 --