Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
10-6295•United States of America v. Edgar Antonio Lagunas-Ocampo
10-6295Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit27.08.2010
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-6295
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
EDGAR ANTONIO LAGUNAS-OCAMPO,
Claimant – Appellant,
and
$2,564.00 IN U.S. CURRENCY,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior
District Judge. (5:09-cv-00015-F)
Submitted: August 19, 2010 Decided: August 27, 2010
Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Edgar Antonio Lagunas-OCampo, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Aubrey
West, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
In this civil forfeiture case, Edgar Lagunas-OCampo
appeals the district court's judgment granting the Government’s
summary judgment motion, and forfeiting the defendant currency
to the Government. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s
judgment. United States v. Lagunas-OCampo, No. 5:09-cv-00015-F
(E.D.N.C. Feb. 10, 2010). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.