Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
10-6138•United States of America v. Eric D. White, a/k/a Eric Barnes, a/k/a Tiger, a/k/a Eric Carter, a/k/a Erick…
10-6138Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit25.06.2010
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-6138
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
ERIC D. WHITE, a/k/a Eric Barnes, a/k/a Tiger, a/k/a Eric
Carter, a/k/a Erick Barnes, a/k/a Eric Keene, a/k/a Eric
Kane, a/k/a Eric Tiger,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior
District Judge. (1:92-cr-00256-JCC-4)
Submitted: June 17, 2010 Decided: June 25, 2010
Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Eric D. White, Appellant Pro Se. Lawrence Joseph Leiser,
Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Eric D. White appeals the district court’s order
denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2006) motion for reduction of
sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. United States v. White, No. 1:92-cr-00256-JCC-4
(E.D. Va. filed Jan. 5, 2010 & entered Jan. 6, 2010). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.