Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
10-6047•United States of America v. Corey Michael Leftwich
10-6047Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit06.04.2010
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-6047
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
COREY MICHAEL LEFTWICH,
Defendant – Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Greenville. Malcolm J. Howard,
Senior District Judge. (4:00-cr-00037-H-1)
Submitted: March 30, 2010 Decided: April 6, 2010
Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Corey Michael Leftwich, Appellant Pro Se. Mary Jude Darrow,
Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Corey Michael Leftwich seeks to appeal the district
court’s order construing his motion for an evidentiary hearing
as a successive 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2009) motion and
dismissing it on that basis. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. United States v.
Leftwich, No. 4:00-cr-00037-H-1 (E.D.N.C. filed Dec. 16, 2009;
entered Dec. 17, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.