Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
10-2375•OWEN HARTY, Individually v. LUIHN FOUR, INC., a Domestic Corporation
10-2375Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit16.11.2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-2375
OWEN HARTY, Individually,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
LUIHN FOUR, INC., a Domestic Corporation,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle,
District Judge. (5:10-cv-00107-BO)
Submitted: October 20, 2011 Decided: November 16, 2011
Before GREGORY and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Pete Monismith, THOMAS B. BACON, P.A., Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania;
Thomas B. Bacon, THOMAS B. BACON, P.A., Cooper City, Florida,
for Appellant. Richard S. McAtee, Paul S. Holscher, JACKSON
LEWIS LLP, Cary, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Owen Harty appeals the district court’s orders
dismissing his claim arising under Title III of the Americans
with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12181-12189 (2006), and
denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. Harty v. Luihn Four,
Inc.
AFFIRMED
, No. 5:10-cv-00107-BO (E.D.N.C. Oct. 13, 2010; Nov. 30,
2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.