Leopold O. V. Enwonwu v. Branch Banking & Trust Company

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-2329
LEOPOLD O. V. ENWONWU,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
BRANCH BANKING & TRUST COMPANY; HOUSE OF RAEFORD FARMS,
INCORPORATED, d/b/a House of Raeford Columbia Farms; ALLAN
RISINGER; ERIC LILES,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, District
Judge. (3:10-cv-00858-CMC)
Submitted: May 31, 2011 Decided: June 7, 2011
Before WILKINSON and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON,
Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Leopold O. V. Enwonwu, Appellant Pro Se. Rachel Gottlieb Peavy,
ROBINSON, MCFADDEN & MOORE, P.C., Columbia, South Carolina;
John S. Simmons, SIMMONS LAW FIRM, L.L.C., Columbia, South
Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Leopold O. V. Enwonwu appeals the district court’s
order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981, 1983, and 1985 (2006)
complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Enwonwu v. Branch Banking & Trust Co., No.
3:10-cv-00858-CMC (D.S.C. Nov. 10, 2010). We deny the motion
for summary reversal and dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --