Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
10-2246•Carlos A. Alford v. Celecia Peers; Brian Mansfield; Good Shepard Ministries
10-2246Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit10.05.2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-2246
CARLOS A. ALFORD,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
CELECIA PEERS; BRIAN MANSFIELD; GOOD SHEPARD MINISTRIES,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
KATRINA KNIGHT; VERNA MANSFIELD,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. Terrence W. Boyle,
District Judge. (7:09-cv-00170-BO)
Submitted: April 28, 2011 Decided: May 10, 2011
Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Carlos A. Alford, Appellant Pro Se. Harry Lee Davis, Jr., Ann
Cox Rowe, DAVIS & HAMRICK, LLP, Winston-Salem, North Carolina,
for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Carlos A. Alford appeals the district court’s order
dismissing this action pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) for
failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Alford v. Peers, No. 7:09-cv-00170-BO (E.D.N.C. Nov. 1,
2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.