Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
10-2239•Kenneth D. Liggins v. Robina R. Bouffault; Clarke County School Board
10-2239Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit20.05.2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-2239
KENNETH D. LIGGINS,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
ROBINA R. BOUFFAULT; CLARKE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD,
Defendants – Appellees.
No. 11-1083
KENNETH D. LIGGINS,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
ROBINA R. BOUFFAULT; CLARKE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD,
Defendants – Appellees.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Glen E. Conrad, Chief
District Judge. (5:09-cv-00077-gec-bwc)
Submitted: May 3, 2011 Decided: May 20, 2011
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
-- 1 of 3 --
2
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kenneth D. Liggins, Appellant Pro Se. Stacy Leann Haney, REED
SMITH, LLP, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
3
PER CURIAM:
Kenneth D. Liggins appeals the district court’s orders
denying his motion for a new trial, entering final judgment on
the jury verdict, and denying his motion for transcripts at
government expense. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. See Liggins v. Clarke County School Bd.,
No. 5:09-cv-00077-gec-bwc (W.D. Va. Oct. 28, 2010; Dec. 6,
2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.