Eugene W. Santos v. RAY MABUS, Secretary of the Navy

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-2151
EUGENE W. SANTOS,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
RAY MABUS, Secretary of the Navy,
Defendant – Appellee.
No. 11-1488
EUGENE W. SANTOS,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
RAY MABUS, Secretary of the Navy,
Defendant – Appellee.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the District
of South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, Chief
District Judge. (2:08-cv-03994-DCN)
Submitted: September 14, 2011 Decided: September 16, 2011
Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

-- 1 of 3 --

2
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Christopher R. Pudelski, LAW OFFICES OF CHRISTOPHER R. PUDELSKI,
Washington, D.C., for Appellant. William N. Nettles, United
States Attorney, Terri Hearn Bailey, Assistant United States
Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
In these consolidated appeals, Eugene Santos appeals
the district court’s orders granting summary judgment in favor
of the Secretary of the Navy on Santos’s employment
discrimination claims, brought pursuant to Title VII of the
Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to
2000e-17 (2006), and granting the Secretary’s motion to
supplement the record. We have reviewed the record and find
that the district court did not commit reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders. See
Santos v. Winter, No. 2:08-cv-03994-DCN (D.S.C. Sept. 21, 2010 &
May 5, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --